The Truth Revealed
Showing posts with label corruptions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corruptions. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

UMNO will oust Najib unless BN's electoral performance in GE-13 improves, says (Tun) Daim Zainuddin

www.malaysiakini.com

UMNO will kick Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak out if he fails to improve BN's electoral result in the next general election, says former finance minister and long-time UMNO Treasurer Daim Zainuddin.

"Reclaiming two-thirds majority is a good vision but (Najib) should be more practical... if, unfortunately, he loses more seats, UMNO will oust him. This is politics," said the UMNO veteran.

In an exclusive interview with Chinese newspaper Sin Chew Daily, Daim explained that removing a political leader who fails to win an election is a global trend, and not just confined to UMNO.

If the country's economic performance is strong, and UMNO is united as a team, Najib will have the upper hand in fighting the next general election, he said. "But this does not mean Najib can win for sure. Just like a tennis game, you still need to play hard to win. Even if you have the upper hand, you cannot afford to make a mistake. Any mistake will cost you the game."

Should Najib step down from the UMNO Presidency, Daim said, the successor would probably be determined by UMNO through a party election.

Although conventionally the Deputy President will be the next president, there could be other leaders in the challenge for the post this time, since everyone aspires to be Prime Minister, he said.

However, Daim gave Najib the thumbs up as a better Prime Minister compared with his predecessors because he listened to the people, which was evident in his commitment to abolish the Internal Security Act and fight corruption.

As a close colleague of former Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Daim was UMNO treasurer from 1984 to 2001.He served as Finance Minister from 1984 to 1991 and as Minister with Special Functions at the Prime Minister's Department and National Economic Action Council (NEAC) Executive Director in 1998, before being re-appointed Finance Minister in 1999. He retired in 2001.

'The Daim Prophecy'

A year before the 2008 general election, Daim warned that BN would lose Penang, Selangor and Kedah and the 'Daim's prophecy' came true when BN was hit by the 'political tsunami' on March 8, 2008. For the coming election, Daim expects Penang and Kelantan to remain Pakatan Rakyat's strongholds.

He said the BN still has chances in Kedah and Selangor, on the condition that UMNO stays united and is able to find formidable candidates to take over as Menteri Besar. It will be an uphill battle for BN to defend Perak, said Daim, because the anti-establishment sentiment among the voters after its controversial re-taking of the state was still strong.

For Kelantan, as long as PAS spritual leader Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat is still the Menteri Besar, Daim is of the view that the BN can say goodbye to the state.

Recipe for success

He also shared his 'recipe' with Najib for winning the next general election. "If I were the Prime Minister, I will focus on Sabah and Sarawak to maintain the status quo there, together with the incumbent seats here (the Peninsula). I will also pay more attention to marginal seats lost in the last election.

"After all, if you travel everywhere, you are also not sure where can get your votes, so you will be just wasting your time."

Timing is also an essential factor that can significantly boost Najib's chances of producing a better electoral result."Election is like a chess game, it is a competition. If I were the Prime Minister, I will know how to play this election game. I think Mahathir also knows," Daim added.

Rafizi on Maju Holdings Deal

by Rafizi Ramli@www.malaysia-chronicle.com

I follow very closely the sale of Kuala Lumpur-Putrajaya highway concessions by Maju Holdings Sdn Bhd to EP Manufacturing Berhad, with reported transactions worth RM1.7 billion.

This immediately raised my suspicions as the highway was constructed using large amounts of public funds through government grants worth RM976.7 million. The overall cost of the expressway is estimated at RM1.32 billion and was mostly funded by the people through the RM976.7 million grant given by the government to Maju Holdings Sdn Bhd.

In addition to these grants, I estimate the injection of funds made by Maju Holdings Sdn Bhd was only about RM60 million (i.e 4.5% of overall costs) as they also borrowed RM370 million from financial institutions.

As a result, the sale proceeds of RM1.7 billion will provide a windfall to Maju Holdings Sdn Bhd if the government grants amounting to RM976.6 million is not refunded and paid back. If this happens, after paying their RM370 million debt to financial institutions, this means that Maju Holdings Sdn Bhd will still make a profit of about RM1.33 billion from the estimated investment capital of RM60 million.

Return the Rakyat's money

I urge the Prime Minister in his role as the Minister of Finance to confirm whether Maju Holdings Sdn Bhd will refund the total of RM976.7 million to the people, because if not, it will raise more questions that will continue to provoke people’s fury.

If the RM1.33 billion profit is kept by Maju Holdings Sdn Bhd, what are the details regarding the terms of the agreement between the Prime Minister with the owner of Maju Holdings Sdn Bhd, who are known to be supporters of UMNO? Was there an agreement that the profits, which were made from public funds, are to be channeled back to UMNO as 'elections funds'?

Lately, it has become the habit of the Prime Minister to approve transactions involving the cronies of UMNO-Barisan Nasional which are worth billions of ringgit, and this in turn has strengthened the people's fears that the high prices will boomerang to hurt them. To make it worse, the secrecy in which the transactions were all shrouded and the utter lack of transparency only adds to the people's suspicions.

2nd suspicious deal in a single month

This highway concessions sale is the second transaction this month alone involving the use of public fund. 1MDB bought the power utility assets and businesses of BN crony Ananda Krishnan. 1MDB is of course controlled by the Prime Minister, and the purchase of the Ananda assets amounted to RM8 billion. Why was Najib willing to spend such a huge sum when 1MDB clearly lacks experience in the power generation industry?

The amount of funds involved here is RM976.6 million, which is four times higher than that of NFC. The Prime Minister may think that he can get away with the NFC debacle, but surely this highway deal involving such a huge amount of public funds will require greater scrutiny and he better be ready to give some answers.

Malaysians must note that the buck for the Maju Holdings deal stops with Najib because the transactions could never go through without his consent as the Finance Minister.

Mohamed Rafizi Ramli is the Strategy Director of Parti Keadilan Rakyat (Translated by Huzainah A Rani of Malaysia Chronicle)

Saturday, September 29, 2007

SOMETHING ARE TERRIBLY WRONG WITH THE ENFORCEMENT AGENCY IN MALAYSIA

If something like this can happened to a serving Policeman, I would shuddered to think what could happen to an ordinary citizen on the street ?










Blow Away The Whistle-blower

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
by Raja Petra Kamarudin

Let me make this short and sharp. Malaysia Today has published many reports about the links between the organised crime syndicate and the Royal Malaysian Police. The seven reports are as follows:


Thus far, six police officers and two underworld operators have come forward to sign Affidavits testifying that undoubtedly there are links between the underworld and the police. Malaysia Today did not publish the two Affidavits signed by the underworld figures (yes, that is my insurance policy in the safe-keeping of someone very important) but the six signed by the police officers were previously published as follows:


Today, what we want to reveal is the story of how one police officer’s family was ‘kidnapped’ by the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) and held for ‘ransom’ to solicit his cooperation. He and his wife have since made police reports on the matter. Isn’t it ironical that even police officers face kidnap threats and they have had to resort to making police reports to seek justice? What danger do you think people like you and I face when we do not wear a police uniform and carry a gun? In fact, when a police officer shot two people in Kuala Terengganu recently, they launched a day and night, house-to-house, state-wide manhunt to look for 37 of the 41 demonstrators who did not ‘surrender’ when the deadline to do so ended. It is not the police officer who shot two people whom they were concerned with. Instead, it was those who the police tried to shoot who are the brunt of the police action.

And now they talk about bringing the parents of a raped, tortured and murdered child to face the music for the tragedy that befell them. And we also hear sermons from people of the cloth who blame scantily-dressed girls for getting raped by sex perverts who can’t keep their hormones in check. Will we next see bank directors getting charged in court when bank robbers rob their banks and goldsmith owners being dragged off to jail in chains when their goldsmith shops get robbed? Yes, and millionaires should be shot when their children get kidnapped because they did not hire bodyguards to look after their children and luxury car owners should be jailed for parking their cars on the street when they went into the restaurant to have dinner instead of employing a driver to sit in the car to guard it against car thieves.

Anyway, let us get back to the police officer whose family was kidnapped by the ACA. Awhile back, Malaysia Today reported that some underworld bosses who were detained under the Emergency Ordinance were released by instructions from some higher-ups in the police force. This was in fact not the only time this happened. There were other such incidence where the Deputy Minister of Internal Security was implicated and where it is said he received RM5.5 million in bribes to release them. The allegation was revealed in an anonymous website which the Deputy Minister concerned suspects someone in the police force itself set up. Nevertheless, the revelation was announced by the police as only they appeared to be aware of the existence of this website and the Deputy Minister was called for interrogation before the ACA. The ACA subsequently announced that the Deputy Minister is innocent of the allegation and they classified the case closed and no further action (NFA) required.

In the second incident it was the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) who was this time accused of perpetuating the exact same thing that the Deputy Minister of Internal Security was accused of. But this time the amount was slightly less than half which the Deputy Minister was accused of. The IGP too was cleared by the ACA. It seems they checked his bank account and could not find RM2 million in it so this means he must be innocent and could not have taken any bribes from the underworld.

So it looks like both the Deputy Minister and the IGP are innocent and the allegations against them are all false. Sure, many underworld bosses who were detained under the Emergency Ordinance were released. But they were released because they were wrongly-detained and their detention did not follow proper procedures and not because the Deputy Minister and the IGP were paid money to release them. And since the ACA launched thorough investigations into the allegations against the Deputy Minister and the IGP and found them innocent then we must take the word of the ACA and assume that they are therefore innocent as what the ACA says. After all, if the ACA could not find the RM7 million or RM8 million in their bank accounts then there is no way they could have taken bribes from the underworld bosses. If they did then the money would still be in their bank accounts.

The government -- meaning here of course the Royal Malaysian Police, the Anti-Corruption Agency, and the Attorney-General’s Chambers -- have said that they have investigated the allegations against the Deputy Minister and the IGP and have found them to be unfounded. It is just two groups that are trying to bring each other down, say those who walk in the corridors of power. The police force is badly split and this is just the result of two groups, Team A and Team B, fighting for control of the police force, explains others in the corridors of power. This is just a turf war between two organised crime syndicates that are trying to gain control of the drugs, prostitution, illegal gambling and loan-sharking rackets, argue yet others who walk in the corridors of power. More theories are thrown onto the table: actually, both Team A and Team B are equally guilty of links with the underworld and each is trying to topple the other so that they can gain control of the drugs, prostitution, illegal gambling and loan-sharking rackets.

Well, whatever it may be, those who walk in the corridors of power should know better. But whatever the reason may be, they are all equally perturbing. This means there are serious problems in the police force. Whether it is one group jealous of another, whether it is a conspiracy to bring down the IGP, whether it is because the police are split into Team A and Team B, whether it is a turf war in the underworld and the police are just taking sides, they are all destructive and merely serves to demonstrate that we have serious problems on Peace Hill. And what irony that Peace Hill is not so peaceful nowadays.

Anyway, the government needs the truth to emerge and the only way for it to emerge would be for those who know the truth to come forward. 90% of the success in solving cases by the Income Tax Department, the Anti-Corruption Agency, the Royal Malaysian Police, etc., is the result of information they receive from whistle-blowers. In fact, the government depends so much on whistle-blowers that it has launched a whistle-blower protection program. Protection of whistle-blowers is internationally accepted and there is even an international agreement to that effect. Whistle-blowers must not only be protected but they have to also be placed under the witness protection programme and relocated with a new identity if need be. That would be the only way to ensure that the crime rate is kept low and the success rate of solving crimes is kept high.

But this does not happen in Malaysia. In Malaysia, if you were to squeal on those from amongst you who are corrupt, you will suffer retribution. Now do you know why it is so hard to pin down those police officers who murdered Altantuyu? Many know what happened but not many dare come forward to reveal what happened. To do so would be detrimental to one’s health.

Take the case of Nordin bin Ahmad, a police officer. He investigated the underworld bosses and helped build up the case against them. He squealed on the dirty cops. And he was made to regret that. They used the ACA to kidnap his wife and children on 23 September 2007 with a warning that they will be released only if he presents himself at the ACA office and changes his testimony implicating the underworld bosses. Both Nordin Ahmad and his wife, Kalsom Mat Nor, have made police reports on the matter which you can view below.

Chief Inspector Nordin Ahmad (right) and Lance Corporal Wong Boon Wai pleaded not guilty to all the charges.
Two policemen claim trial to 14 counts of forgery

Yes, this is the same ACA that investigated the allegations against the Deputy Minister of Internal Security and the IGP and subsequently cleared them. If the ACA can resort to kidnapping the family of police officers and witnesses who testify against crooks, it makes one wonder whether you can any longer take the word of the ACA. It appears like they are accessories to crime rather than the eliminators of it. It appears like the ACA helps cover up the crime instead of going after the criminal. I know they say it takes a thief to catch a thief. But in this case the thief is protecting the thief and kidnapping the family of those who report the thief.

Many other witnesses and whistle-blowers were also summoned before those who walk in the corridors of power, in particular those who have signed Affidavits testifying to the fact they have received instructions from the underworld or received instructions from their superiors in the police force to cooperate with the underworld bosses and follow whatever orders they receive from them. Whistle-blowers have been exposed and now fear for their lives. Whistle-blowers will now get blown away. And the purpose of this exercise is to ‘prove’ that the allegations against Goh Cheng Poh a.k.a Tengku and his minions are false. On 1 October 2007, the court is scheduled to hear the application from Tengku for his detention and restricted residence order to be declared mala fide. If the court buys what he says, then this notorious underworld boss will be out on the streets in time to send Hari Raya Ang Pows to the dozens of police officers he has in his pocket.

Anyway, I am sure they will adduce all sorts of ‘evidence’ in court to ‘prove’ that Tengku is law-abiding, is a member of the Rotary Club and PTA, goes to the temple every week to pray, does uncountable charity work and dishes out donations to needy people by the millions, and all such bullshit. And I am going to start taking bets that Tengku will soon be back on the streets and all those police officers who arrested him and those witnesses who testified against him will wish they had never been born.

Any takers anyone? Let’s make it cheap: teh tarik at a favourite watering-hole of the winner’s choice.



Friday, September 28, 2007

Guan Eng reports OPV issues to ACA

By: Ng Kee Seng (The Sun, Fri, 28 Sep 2007)

KUALA LUMPUR (Sept 28, 2007): DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng today lodged a report with the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) on alleged abuses of Power and irregularities in the purchase of six Offshore Patrol Vessels( OPVs) and the detroying of relevant documents.

Lim lodge the report in the Kuala Lumpur Federal Territory ACA office on Jalan Sultan Hishamuddin about noon, attended to by ACA Supt Zulkifly Zainal Abidin. He also attached to his report a letter to ACA Acting Senior Asst Comm I Abu Zubir Mahfodz @ Hatmon.

"It's not only the irregularities and destroying of evidence. The shocking 38% or RM 1.85 billion increase in the contract from RM4.9 billion To RM6.75 billion and waiver of RM214 million in penalties on the contractor for late delivery must be investigated," he said after lodging the report.

"The DAP had earlier called for a Royal Commission of Inquiry to be set up to determine whether the Cabinet was misled into making a foolish decision to approve the RM 1.85 billion increase in the contract and waiver of penalty.

"However there is no such urgency to find the truth as to how the public lost so much money in getting six OPVs that are either still not operational or undelivered. Clearly, the Prime Minister’s efforts to promote transparency, accountability and good governance by demanding that ministries must answer for the instances of mismanagement disclosed in the Auditor-General’s 2006 Report is mere lip service and empty promises.

"There is greater urgency in discovering the truth of this scandal following the shocking revelation by Public Accounts Committee (PAC) chairman Datuk Shahrir Abdul Samad that certain records have been destroyed and that PAC has not been able to get hold of sufficient company reports regarding the vessels.

"Datuk Shahrir was quoted as saying that the records destroyed involved the first two problem-ridden vessels which were delivered to the Royal Malaysian Navy last year after a two-year delay.

"The RM6.75 billion OPV scandal is the largest single case of misuse of funds in the 2006 Auditor-General (A-G)’s Report. PSC-NDSB had agreed to supply 6 OPVs at RM4.9 billion, which was arranged without an open public tender.

"This was subsequently increased to RM5.35 billion in September 1998. All the 6 OPVs were supposed to be delivered by April 2007 with the first delivery on March 2004. However only 2 OPVs were delivered so far and the 2 OPVs are not fully operational as the technical specifications required are still not completely performed.

"The two OPVs delivered in June and July 2006 respectively had 100 and 383 incomplete works and items at the point of handing over. There were 298 complaints over the operations of the vessels. This puts the life and safety of our sailors at risk if such OPVs are put out to sea when it is not performing at optimum capacity," said Lim.

The A-G estimated that the government can claim at least RM 214 million in late penalties for the late delivery of the two OPVs and non-delivery of the remaining four OPVs.

Lim said: "However in another remarkable and unwarranted act of charity and generosity, the Cabinet on Nov 29, 2006, waived the claim of penalties. Worse, in a continuing act of generosity and charity the government increased the contract price by RM1.4 billion in January 2007.

"The cost for the 6 OPVs had risen by RM1.85 billion or 38% from the original contract price of RM4.9 billion to RM6.75 billion, ie to RM5.35 billion in September 1998 and again to RM6.75 billion in January 2007."

"The A-G also criticised the monitoring by the project steering committee. Was the Cabinet misled?"

In the letter enclosed to the ACA report, Lim urged the ACA to focus on six prime investigative areas:

  • Why were there no open tender and instead the contract awarded to PSC-Naval Dockyard Sdn Bhd - a subsidiary of PSC Industries Bhd owned by Umno associate Amin Shah Omar Shah - in 1998?;

  • What is the justification for increasing the contract value by 38% or RM 1.85 billion to RM 6.75 billion when the contractor had already failed to perform?;

  • Why did the government waive claims of at least RM214 million in late penalties for the late delivery of the two OPVs and non-delivery of the remaining four OPVs?;

  • Why no action was taken against the contractor for sub-standard work on the two OPVs delivered in June and July 2006 respectively which failed to fulfill technical specifications with over 483 incomplete works and items and 298 complaints over the operations of the vessels?;

  • Why did the Defence Ministry pay in advance RM4.26 billion to the contractor by Dece 31, 2006, even though progress of work done only amounts to RM2.87 billion, which is RM 1.4 billion more than the contractor is entitled to claim?; and

  • Who ordered the destruction of the documents as announced by Datuk Shahrir?



  • ACA Report on Abuses of Power and Irregularities into the Purchase of 6 Offshore Patrol Vessels (OPV)

    Pmg. Penolong Kanan Pesuruhjaya I Abu Zubir Bin Hj. Mahfodz @ Hatmon,
    Pengarah Negeri,
    Badan Pencegah Rasuah (BPR) WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR,
    Tingkat 5 & 6, Rumah Persekutuan
    Jalan Sultan Hishamuddin Peti Surat 6000,
    50502 KUALA LUMPUR

    DENGAN TANGAN

    Tuan,

    BPR Report On Abuses Of Power And Irregularities Into The Purchase Of 6 Offshore Patrol Vessels(OPV) Where Relevant Documents Have Been Destroyed And The Shocking Increase Of 38% or RM 1.85 Billion In The Contract Value From RM 4.9 Billion To RM 6.75 Billion And Waiver RM 214 Million In Penalties For Late Delivery.

    We wish to make a report to the BPR to investigate the abuses of power and irregularities surrounding the purchase of 6 OPVs where relevant documents have been destroyed and the shocking increase of 38% or RM 1.85 billion in the contract value from RM 4.9 billion to RM 6.75 billion and waiver from collecting RM 214 million in penalties imposed on the contractor for late delivery.

    DAP had earlier requested that the Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister YAB Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak establish a Royal Commission of Inquiry to determine whether Cabinet was misled into making a foolish decision to approve the increase by 38% or RM 1.85 billion in the contract value of the 6 OPVs from RM 4.9 billion to RM 6.75 billion and waive RM 214 million in penalties for late delivery.

    However there is no such urgency to find the truth as to how the public lost so much money in getting 6 OPVs that are either still not operational or undelivered. Clearly the Prime Minister’s efforts to promote transparency, accountability and good governance by demanding that Ministries must answer for the instances of mismanagement disclosed in the Auditor-General’s 2006 Report is mere lip service and empty promises.

    There is greater urgency in discovering the truth of this scandal following the shocking revelation by Public Accounts Committee (PAC) Chair Datuk Shahrir Abdul Samad in Malaysiakini on 26 September 2007 that certain records have been destroyed and that PAC has not been able to get hold of sufficient company reports regarding the vessels. Datuk Shahrir said that the records destroyed involved the first two problem-ridden vessels, which were delivered to the Royal Malaysian Navy last year after a two-year delay.

    The RM 6.75 billion OPV scandal is the largest single case of misuse of funds in the 2006 Auditor-General’s Report. PSC-NDSB had agreed to supply 6 OPVs at RM 4.9 billion, which was arranged without an open public tender. This was subsequently increased to RM 5.35 billion in September 1998. All the 6 OPVs were supposed to be delivered by April 2007 with the first delivery on March 2004. However only 2 OPVs were delivered so far and the 2 OPVs are not fully operational as the technical specifications required are still not completely performed.

    The two OPVs were only delivered in June and July 2006 respectively had 100 and 383 incomplete works and items at the point of handing over. There were 298 complaints over the operations of the vessels. This puts the life and safety of our sailors at risk if such OPVs are put out to sea when it is not performing at optimum capacity.

    A penalty of 0.5% per month based on the contract value is imposed for any delay. However such penalties can not exceed RM 53.5 million, a very generous self-imposed limit by the government. The first OPV was late by 27 months and the second OPV was late by 18 months but yet both are imposed penalties of RM 53.5 million each due to the self-imposed limit.

    The other four OPVs are still not delivered. The Auditor-General Report estimated that the government can claim at least RM 214 million in late penalties for the late delivery of the 2 OPVs and non-delivery of the remaining 4 OPVs. However in another remarkable and unwarranted act of charity and generosity, the Cabinet on 29.11.2006 waived the claim of penalties.

    Worse, in a continuing act of generosity and charity the government increased the contract price by RM 1.4 billion in January 2007. The cost for the 6 OPVs had risen by RM 1.85 billion or 38% from the original contract price of RM 4.9 billion to RM 6.75 billion, ie to RM 5.35 billion in September 1998 and again to RM 6.75 billion in January 2007.

    The Auditor-General also criticized the monitoring by the project steering committee - led by YAB Deputy Prime Minister and an executive management committee chaired by top ministry officials. Was the YAB Deputy Prime Minister being misled resulting in Cabinet also been misled? If so, severe action should be taken against the officials involved.

    The most shocking aspect about this RM 6.75 billion scandal is why the Defence Ministry pay in advance RM 4.26 billion to the contractor by 31.12.2006, even though progress of work done only amounts to RM 2.87 billion? Would not the government lose RM 1.4 billion already paid to the contractor should the contractor abscond and flee overseas?

    In summary the ACA should focus on 6 prime investigative areas in the RM 6.75 billion OPV scandal, especially the key people who gave approval.

    1. Why were there no open tender and instead the contract awarded to PSC-Naval Dockyard Sdn Bhd - a subsidiary of PSC Industries Bhd owned by Umno associate Amin Shah Omar Shah - in 1998?

    2. What is the justification for increasing the contract value by 38% or RM 1.85 billion to RM 6.75 billion when the contractor had already failed to perform?

    3. Why did the government waive claims of at least RM 214 million in late penalties for the late delivery of the 2 OPVs and non-delivery of the remaining 4 OPVs?

    4. Why no action was taken against the contractor for sub-standard work on the two OPVs delivered in June and July 2006 respectively which failed to fulfill technical specifications with over 483 incomplete works and items and 298 complaints over the operations of the vessels risking the lives and safety of our sailors?

    5. Why did the Defence Ministry pay in advance RM 4.26 billion to the contractor by 31.12.2006, even though progress of work done only amounts to RM 2.87 billion, which is RM 1.4 billion more than the contractor is entitled to claim?

    6. Who ordered the destruction of the documents as announced by Datuk Shahrir?

    BPR must investigate how RM 6.75 billion could be lost to purchase OPVs for the defence of our naval waters that would either not be delivered or not fully operational. The 2006 Auditor-General’s Report had provided all the necessary materials that would assist BPR’s investigations and clearly spelt out that there was “no justification” for the government to approve the extra RM 1.4 billion and waiving RM 214 million in penalties for late delivery that it was entitled to claim from the contractor.

    It would be unfortunate if those that expose corruption are persecuted and punished whereas those who commit such wrongdoings can prosper and flourish. Failure to take action on this massive scandal would only confirm negative public perceptions about the role of the Anti-Corruption Agency and not help to restore public confidence in Malaysia’s commitment to establish integrity, accountability and transparency as part of Malaysian culture.

    It is this failure that has caused Malaysia’s position in the 2007 Transparency International Corruption Perception Index to be at No. 43, which though an improvement from last year’s No. 44, is still far below the No. 37th position enjoyed by Malaysia when YAB Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi took over in 2003. Only firm and stern action taken against such high-profile cases involving huge amounts of public funds highlighted even in the Auditor-General’s report can facilitate the restoration of our credibility and commitment to combat corruption.

    Yours faithfully,


    LIM GUAN ENG
    SECRETARY-GENERAL

    Saturday, July 14, 2007

    Incriminating Evidence Against the IGP

    There is clearly an incriminating evidence against the IGP Tan Sri Musa Hassan as reported in the Malaysia Today website. There was a Statutory Declaration signed by an Assistant Superintendent of Police dated on 13 July 2007. It would be interesting if the ACA could interview this ASP to get deeper into this corruption allegations against Tan Sri Musa. Hopefully there will not be any cover-up on this matter.

    Full Articles below: The Malaysia Today article posted by Raja Petra Kamarudin in THE CORRIDORS OF POWER


    I have been monitoring the comments in Malaysia Today’s blogs concerning the news item on the Anti-Corruption Agency’s (ACA’s) announcement absolving the Deputy Minister of Internal Security, Johari Baharum, of corruption. Johari was alleged to have received RM5.5 million in bribes as an inducement to release three Chinese organised crime bosses from detention.

    Most readers appear appalled and are up in arms that Johari was pronounced innocent. They were pretty sure he is guilty as hell and should therefore be hung upside down by his balls. Let us get one thing very clear. If anyone were to propose that a lynching team be formed to hang Johari from the nearest tree, I would be first in line to volunteer joining the mob. But it would not be for the crime of accepting bribes to release three organised crime bosses. It would be for the role he played in sabotaging Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad in the Kubang Pasu division elections last year.

    Sure, I know, you are now going to tell me that Johari was just following the orders of the Umno Supreme Council that is headed by Umno President cum Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. Yes, I know about that meeting where Johari and the Menteri Besar of Kedah were summoned before the Umno Supreme Council and that both were ordered to ensure, by hook or by crook, that Mahathir losses the contest for the post of delegate to the Umno Annual General Assembly. I also know that the meeting was recorded and that Rais Yatim pointed out how stupid it is to put such a sensitive matter on record as the entire Umno Supreme Council would be implicated in a breach of the party Constitution and the party Code of Ethics. I also know that the Minutes were then recalled and replaced with new Minutes with three pages of this extremely incriminating evidence expunged from the new Minutes.

    Nevertheless, although the records were wiped clean and the Minutes amended to expunge all evidence of the crime, Johari, notwithstanding he was merely following orders under instructions of the Umno Supreme Council, cannot be absolved of this crime. But this is his only crime as far as I know. As for the crime of receiving RM5.5 million in bribes to release three Chinese organised crime bosses, I can categorically state that he is not guilty of this. And I will relate in awhile why I say so. On how the anonymous website mysteriously emerged to accuse him of this crime, and who is behind that website, this is anybody’s guess. But I heard that the police already know who set that website up with the sole intent of implicating Johari in the crime of receiving bribes from underworld bosses. Maybe the police will soon close in on the culprits and bring them to book, which I heard was perpetuated by police officers themselves.

    Anyway, Malaysia Today has done its own independent investigation to get to the bottom of the allegation against Johari. And this is what we discovered, much to our surprise. In fact, Malaysia Today is in custody of the signed Statutory Declarations of no less than half a dozen police officers and many more have indicated that they are prepared to come forward to reveal the rot in the police force and expose how the Chinese organised crime syndicate is practically running the Royal Malaysian Police (PDRM). But we shall address that matter later.

    Today, we want to focus on the allegation that Johari received RM5.5 million to release three Chinese organised crime bosses. And as follows is what happened.

    There is this Malay police officer holding the rank of ASP who we shall just refer to as Deep Throat, or DT for short. DT has in fact authorised Malaysia Today to reveal his name but we thought we would keep that a secret for now in the event we need him to come forward to testify in a court of law later on.

    On 21 August 2006, DT, who was then based in Sabah, was promoted to the rank of ASP, backdated to 1 July 2005. This promotion, however, would involve a transfer, so DT approached his boss, DSP Chew Tham Soon, to enlist his help in the matter. DT later found out that DSP Chew had proposed that he be transferred to Johor. DT did not actually want to go to Johor. He would rather remain where he was. DSP Chew, however, persuaded DT to accept the transfer.

    In November 2006, DSP Chew brought DT and DSP Wan Hassan, the Deputy Commander of the Police Training Centre in Kota Kinabalu, to Petaling Jaya to meet someone who could assist police personnel in matters of transfers and promotions. The person DT was introduced to in his office in the Amcorp Mall was BK Tan.

    BK Tan then interviewed DT to get a better understanding of his background and experience. During this interview, a fat Chinese man by the name of Ah Hon entered the room and was introduced to DT as the man in-charge of the Southern Zone. Ah Hon would be contacting DT whenever the need arises.

    As they were talking, Dato Othman Talib, a member of the Police Force Commission, entered the office and BK Tan left the room to greet him. This is the man who vets and recommends promotions of police officers and who has a very close relationship with BK Tan.

    A short Chinese man also entered the room at about that same time. This man was introduced to DT as DSP Ng Fook Long, the man in charge of Johor who DT would be serving under. DT was assured that BK Tan has a very close and personal relationship with the IGP and that the IGP would listen to all his recommendations. In short, they were demonstrating to DT that they call the shots and nothing happens in the police force without them agreeing to it. DSP Chew also pointed out another man in the next room. This was none other than the IGP’s son who shared an office with BK Tan.

    DT sat there watching while the assembly of police officers and the Chinese organised crime bosses discussed the latest transfers and promotions in the police force.

    The following month, in December 2006, DT finally received confirmation of his transfer to Johor. That same day, DT received a phone call from Ah Hon enquiring as to when he would report for duty and that he should make his way to Johor as soon as possible.

    Within two or three days of his confirmation of transfer to Johor, DT was advised by some other police officers who had once served in Johor to be wary of the Chinese organised crime syndicate. On 16 January 2007, DT reported for duty in Johor.

    As soon as he reported for duty, Ah Hon contacted DT to inform him that his house was ready and he immediately went to inspect it. The house at Bistari Impian in Larkin belonged to a Chinese woman. When DT asked how much the rental was, he was informed that it was usually RM1,200 but for him it would be reduced to RM900. Nevertheless, he was told to not worry about the rent. He could move in first and they could sort out the matter of the rent later.

    DT’s new boss, DSP Ng, told him that he can carry on and do his job except for the illegal lotteries or empat nombor ekor haram. For illegal lotteries he would have to refer to him (DSP Ng) first before taking any action.

    On 28 February 2007, DT received a SMS from Ah Hon asking him to conduct raids in three localities in Kulai with instructions to make sure that he does not ‘come back empty’. DT informed DSP Ng about this and he (DSP Ng) replied that he too had received the same SMS. DT was quite upset about this turn of events. We are police officers and cannot receive instructions from the organised crime syndicate, said DT. DSP Ng did not respond but just kept quiet.

    In early March 2007, DT moved out of the house that Ah Hon had arranged for him and went to look for new lodgings in Bandar Baru Uda. Realising that DT did not want to have anything more to do with the organised crime syndicate, Ah Hon sent DT a SMS apologising for instructing him to conduct the raid the month before. Thereafter, Ah Hon never contacted DT again.

    That same month, DT received information about the organised crime syndicate headed by Goh Cheng Poh a.k.a Tengku that came under the jurisdiction of Ah Hon. According to the information DT received, Tengku would determine whom the police should raid. These are basically independent operators who refuse to come under the organised crime syndicate’s network and who chose to remain independent. DT was also informed that any police officer who did not play ball would immediately be transferred out of Johor and placed under cold storage. DSP Mohd Hedzir Bin Hussin and Inspector Ng Swee Min were mentioned as two such police officers who serve the organised crime syndicate.

    On 28 March 2007, a team from Bukit Aman headed by DSP Zawawi went down to Johor to conduct raids in two locations at Taman Sri Putri in Kulai. 32 fax machines were confiscated and 17 people arrested in that raid. A police report detailing this raid was made in Kulai (report number 2588/2007) while another report was made in Johor Bharu Selatan (report number 7295/2007).

    Resulting from this raid, three people -- Soh King Siang, Lim Chin Chai and Lee Yoke Han -- were recommended for detention under the Emergency Ordinance. Till today, the approval to detain them has not been given yet while the case-file for their boss, Tengku, could not be opened due to ‘lack of statement’. Instead, 13 police reports were made against DT alleging that he physically abused those detained and disciplinary action was instituted against him.

    On 30 March 2007, DT and his team detained another three Chinese organised crime syndicate bosses under the Emergency Ordinance -- Chai Ngew, Chin Yew Fah and Tan Lee Poey. Under the Emergency Ordinance, just like under the Internal Security Act, one can be detained for up to 60 days after which one is either released or sent for further two years detention as the case may be. These three, however, were released after just nine days without DT’s knowledge. From what DT found out, the Deputy Director of the CID, Dato Khalid Abu Bakar, had ordered their release in spite of the detention order still being in force. On 29 May 2007, all the officers involved in the detention of these crime bosses were transferred out and placed in cold storage.

    To cover their tracks, they had to pin the blame on a kambing hitam (sacrificial lamb). And this most unfortunate sacrificial lamb selected as the fall guy is the Deputy Minister of Internal Security, Johari Baharum. But that is all now history and water under the bridge. We all know about the allegation against Johari Baharum. What we want to know is: is Johari innocent or guilty of accepting a bribe of RM5.5 million to release these three Chinese organised crime syndicate bosses and scum of the earth? It appears, though, like he may be innocent after all. It was the CID and not the Deputy Minister who arranged for their release, and behind the backs of those who had arrested them on top of that. Well, if Johari is innocent and did not take the RM5.5 million bribe to release these three, then who did?

    Yes, this is what the ACA may have to now look into. And I believe the ACA has already started interviewing those concerned to get to the bottom of the whole issue. Let us hope the ACA uncovers what Malaysia Today has uncovered. If not, then Malaysia Today may have to run a few more episodes of this series until the walls come crumbling down.

    Nevertheless, we doubt that anything much will come out of the ACA investigation. The man tasked with the job of conducting the investigation is too junior and has barely been three years on the job. This man, Suhaimi, does not seem to even know the right questions to ask. We hope the ACA is not intentionally sending a man ill-equipped to do the job so that the whole thing can be botched up due to inexperience.

    The Statutory Declaration signed by DT on 13 July 2007


    Monday, July 2, 2007

    Apa Sudah Jadi, PM?

    by YES MINISTER

    In the past few weeks, serious allegations of wrong doings of the IGP Tan Sri Musa had been reported in Malaysia Today web portal (read here and here) and Tan Sri Musa himself dismissed such report as a mere slander (read here and here). READ THE LATEST REVELATION IN HERE

    As if the Prime Minister is condoning such action of corruptions in this country, he had extended Tan Sri Musa tenure as Inspector General of Police (
    Bernama report here and The Star, here), simply brushing aside the serious allegations and taking no consideration of the rakyats sentiment over the allegations. Apa sudah jadi, PM?

    When Deputy Minister of Ministry of Home Affairs Datuk Johari Baharom was alleged received of RM5 Million to release the underworld figure from detention which was report by the anonymous website, he was immediately referred to the ACA for further investigations.

    But why is allegations against Tan Sri Musa was being treated differently. Is PM Abdullah Badawi practice of selective prosecution in Malaysia. Is Tan Sri Musa or for that matter IGP, above the Law of this country?

    DPM Najib, when asked about the serious allegations against Tan Sri Musa, had this to say, "“I don’t know about the allegations. Let me check,” (read here and here). Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said he was not aware of the postings on a website involving the country’s top police officer.

    Anyway as a consolation, Deputy Internal Security Minister Datuk Mohd Johari Baharom was quoted by a local Malay daily as having said that the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) was free to investigate Musa over the allegations. He said ministry secretary-general Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Yusoff would monitor developments.

    PM Abdullah should direct the ACA to investigate Musa, if he does not wish to be seen as in collusion with the Police and serious about fighting corruptions in this country.

    Even former IGP Tun Hanif wrote in his weekly column "Point of View", said the contents of the allegations against Musa are exceptionally defamatory and it won’t do for the maligned authorities to merely wish them away. He even suggested that, if the allegations hasn't true, action should be take against the author of the articles.

    Well then, the ball is in the PM Abdullah hands. So, what you gonna do Mr Prime Minister?

    Thursday, May 10, 2007

    RM32 millions Kickbacks: 1.1 billion Yen Questions

    by YES MINISTER

    Tony Thien reported on May 10, in Malaysiakini.com that Sarawak ACA has received the go-ahead from their headquarters in Putrajaya to investigate the Japan Times report implicating Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud and his family with the alleged RM32 million kickbacks paid by Japanese shipping companies for transporting Sarawak logs to Japan.

    This is what most people are eagerly waiting for. Hope that the ACA will also investigate other corruptions allegations against Taib.

    BE BRAVE: Taib stressing a point when opening the
    Parliamentary Seminar for Government Backbenchers 2007.
    — Photo by Jeffery Mostapa, The Borneo Post

    Perhaps knowing what is forthcoming, Taib had this to say when opening the Parliamentary Seminar for Government Backbenchers 2007 here in Pantai Damai, Sarawak, "Our (legal) system is good enough to fight it out and I will show the example to you. You should not be afraid”.

    This is so much sound like a person who is apparently trying psychic himself knowing his fate would be sealed or someone who is in panicked. This is the result of the psychological warfare inflicted upon him by the people. And he added, "government backbenchers not to cower in the face of accusations but to make full use of the country’s legal system to “fight it out”. Building a self-confident and trying to instill comradeship in the backbenchers, meaning let's us fight it together and indirectly saying, "please help me, I'm in troubled". Absolutely compunction. "Bird of a feather float together" hmmm... what a saying.

    It is a well known secret that Dewaniaga is a state-affiliated concern in charge of lumber export control and is headed by the Sarawak chief minister's younger brother Onn bin Mahmud, the centre of the RM32 million kickbacks allegation against the Chief Minister Taib Mahmud that was reported in the Japan Times.

    Dewaniaga Sarawak (DNS), a company affiliated with the Malaysian state of Sarawak, instructed NFA members to pay so-called intermediation fees to the Hong Kong agent, Regent Star (RS). The Chief Minister's brother Onn bin Mahmud also sits on the board of CMS. Not only is Abdul Taib Mahmud Chief Minister, he's also the Resource Management and Planning Minister. That means he's also the Forestry Minister.

    Trying to justify his action on the related matter Taib said: “If you base this by Western standards, of course, there must be something wrong with this country, where a small group of people are sometimes related … as brothers, cousins, classmates … you can’t avoid these things (people being related to one another).

    Well, it might still be alright if it is just one or two projects that is given to family members. But one too many and almost everthing is monopolised given to the same family, then there must be something wrong. Rightly so, the Rakyat should question? There would be other members of the community who also would like to have a share in the economic pie of the State. Afterall no one should have the right to deny other people from making a decent living.

    And he added, “If you avoid them, you are going to push most of the jobs of developing the State to people who are not connected to the administration, not connected to politics and who can’t implement. They can’t implement your dreams of achieving prosperity". What is wrong if they're not connected to the administration or politically connected? Evereyone should be given a chance to participate in developing the state as long they're capable. As Raja Dr Nazrin correctly said in his keynotes address NATIONAL UNITY AND DEVELOPMENT IN MALAYSIA: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES FOR NATION BUILDING; "First, Malaysians of all races, religions, and geographic locations need to believe beyond a shadow of a doubt that they have a place under the Malaysian sun. Only when each citizen believes that he or she has a common home and is working towards a common destiny, will he or she make the sacrifices needed for the long haul". When people are feeling neglected, of course they will becomes dismayed with the government. In order achieve prosperity, it should not be confined to a single family or community, but to all the Rakyats. That must be the objectives of the government.

    “Prosperity is not only about investing in the economy. It depends also on having enough good people to translate your dreams into commercial reality” Taib said.

    Wow... is this the thrust of the Barisan Nasional government of which Taib is the state BN head how to develop Sarawak, encouraging cronyism and nepotism? Meaning to say, there are no other Sarawakian capable of implementing any state government projects other than his own family members? This is really absurd! It has been proven that his family members had failed miserably in running a financial Institution, that it had to be sold to the other party? And what's else are the other Sarawakian not capable of other his family members?

    Friday, May 4, 2007

    Don’t cower, backbenchers!

    Corruption is like termites. Just like ‘anai anai’ (termites) destroy the integrity of wood, corruption ‘eats away’ the integrity of society and country. Don't cower, backbenchers! Be brave, "fight it out"

    CLICK PICTURE FOR LARGER IMAGE