by Ong Hean Teik
MAY 8 , 2013
The
Utusan Malaysia headline of May 7 posed an interesting and pertinent
question of what more do the Chinese in Malaysia want. It is a pity that
Utusan is unable to see that what the Chinese want is, in fact, what
the educated urban Malaysian voter wants, regardless of race or
religion. There are three important characteristics lacking in the
Barisan of today.
Intelligent, courageous leadership
The
Chinese comprise only 30 per cent of Malaysian voters, yet Pakatan
Rakyat won 51 per cent of the total votes cast. By saying that the
election result was because of the Chinese voters, the Barisan Nasional
leadership demonstrates an inability to objectively face reality.
Barisan’s
acceptance of Zulkifli Nordin as its direct Shah Alam candidate
similarly shows a lack of intelligence and courage. Here is a lawyer who
does not feel that dialogue and discussion can resolve matters, having
forcefully disrupted a Law Society seminar. He has vowed loyalty to, and
then turned on his previous political parties. He has publicly
belittled an ancient religion with a million Malaysian followers.
Umno
making way for Ibrahim Ali to contest the Pasir Mas constituency is
similarly bad judgement, showing its acceptance and approval of a crude
man who prides himself with using vulgar words in public interviews.
To
give them such special honour and credit shows a lack of intelligent
reasoning and an inability to stand up against the loud extremist
faction of the party.
Attributing
the election outcome to a “Chinese tsunami” is illogical in the face of
concrete facts and data. PAS won an additional seven state seats in
Selangor, all in Malay majority areas.
Lim
Kit Siang could not have achieved a majority of over 14,000 votes in
Gelang Patah without good support from Malays who form 35 per cent of
the electorate there.
Similarly
the Umno-backed Perkasa extremists were conclusively rejected in Pasir
Mas (96 per cent Malay) and in Shah Alam where Malays make up 70 per
cent of the electorate.
To
blindly spin the 2013 election outcome to suit its raced-based founding
philosophy of 1947shows up a political party that wants to be
stubbornly unwise. Unless Umno’s leadership can find the courage to face
facts, the party may become redundant and obsolete for the educated
21st century voter.
Respect and recognition of rights
Academic
studies have consistently shown that increased income brings more
happiness and satisfaction only up to a certain point. When a society
progresses out of poverty into middle class, increasing income does not
increase satisfaction proportionately. It is the psychological aspects
of living that produces a better quality of life.
Whatever
the radiation scientists claim, the people of Bentong (45 per cent
Malay, 44 per cent Chinese) will ask why a factory run by an Australian
company is unsuitable for Australia or Damansara Heights but can be
located in their backyard.
In
2008, Health Minister Liow won Bentong by over 12,000 votes. This year
he retained Bentong with less than 400 votes against a political novice
who is a green activist. The urban electorate, Chinese or Malay, seeks
respect and recognition of their right to a safe living environment.
In
Penang, the 1 Malaysia Charity organisation hosted numerous concerts
and dinners in support of Barisan candidates. At their functions,
T-shirts, beer, hawker food and lucky draw gifts were given free.
Initially
there was merriment and wonder at this new campaigning style; this then
became anger and disgust when even cash incentives were handed out. The
electorate felt they were treated with disrespect, as if their rights,
dignity and vote were for sale.
Numerous
development issues had plagued the Penang DAP government in the months
leading up to the election, and the increased majority they subsequently
obtained can only be explained by the strong rejection what the other
side represents. Money cannot buy happiness, and similarly, the urban
electorate set out to show that money cannot buy their vote in Penang.
The
urban electorate in Malaysia is obviously better off economically
compared to the rural dwellers. They have reached a stage when extra
economic incentives can no longer easily win their approval.
Instead
they asked for respect, and an acknowledgement of their right to an
inclusive, peaceful existence in the country. They seek recognition as a
legitimate electorate with the right to choose the governing party.
Blaming and insulting them for voting against the Barisan will only
guarantee the DAP and Pakatan a brighter future.
Competent efficient institutions
There
is no doubt that relative to those who were once our equivalent, we
Malaysians have fallen behind. The Singapore dollar which was equivalent
to the ringgit in the 1970’s is today 2.5 times higher. Malaysia beat
South Korea and Japan in the 1972 Olympic football qualifying rounds;
today we are nowhere near these 2 World Cup Finals participating
countries.
Universiti
Malaya had topped the list of universities passing the United States
medical qualifying examination in 1969, ahead of Melbourne and Singapore
University. In 2011, Universiti Malaya was ranked 401 out of the 500
universities in the Shanghai Jiao Tong University’s Academic Ranking of
World Universities.
The
educated, smart-phone holding, internet-surfing, urban voter is aware
of world-wide trends and wants to experience the best that life can
offer. When the governing party is unable to develop the country to its
full potential, its popularity will drop.
As
demonstrated by the Noble prize winning Dr Ivan Pavlov, animals respond
to incentives, and man is no exception. A system that promotes those
who agree with and pamper those in power while sidelining those working
hard to pursue competency will breed inefficient malfunctioning
institutions. Even those not under their direct employment will be
affected by these incompetent institutions.
When
the police force is politicised and crime rate increases, more money
will have to be spent on personal and household security. Even Datuk
Nazir Razak admitted that he had hesitated coming back to Malaysia
because of concerns about his children’s education. When the middle
class spends on private education or healthcare, votes for the governing
party will drop.
Conclusion
The
Chinese now make up only 25 per cent of Malaysia’s population and to be
named as the cause of major developments in the country is to be
hurtful to this minority and insulting to the majority. On the other
hand, government statistics show that Malaysia’s urban population has
increased from 62 per cent in 2000 to 71 per cent in 2010.
No
amount of rhetorical whitewashing can hide the fact that the poor
performance of Barisan in the 2013 election is due to its failure to win
the heart and mind of the urban voter. The faster it faces reality and
move away from its obsolete race-based mindset, the better its prospects
for the next electoral battle.
* Dr Ong Hean Teik is a consultant cardiologist in Penang. He reads The Malaysian Insider.
*
This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not
necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.
No comments:
Post a Comment