FMT LETTER: From Stephen Ng, via e-mail
While I may want to congratulate Professor Dr Mohamad Tajuddin
Mohamad Rasdi for his article, ‘Turning the other cheek on the ‘Allah’
issue’, the fact is that he is far from the correct interpretation of
the phrase, ‘Turn your other cheek’.
Dr Tajuddin has at least the intellectualism necessary for
discussion, compared to most other Muslim extremists from Perkasa, Jati
and Isma. Allow me to therefore, briefly take him on with my side of the
story, which will hopefully enlighten him further on the controversy of
Allah in Malaysia. I speak as a layman, with little or no theological
background.
Meek, of course!
Meek, of course!
Firstly, the Christian community in Malaysia, since the Alkitab was
first banned during former prime minister, Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s first
year in power, has been ‘meek’ by comparison. For the past 20 years,
church leaders have continued to tolerate the nonsense, but continued to
bring in the Alkitab for the younger generation of Malaysians who were
only fluent in Bahasa Malaysia. They have continued to use the name
Allah in their worship service with great reverence for the name.
Those of us who did not agree initially began to understand why the
name Allah has to be kept in the Alkitab translation, in order to be
consistent with the rest of the Malay archipelago, which includes
Indonesia, Sabah and Sarawak (where the majority of the Christians are
based).
I cannot imagine, for example, for a West Malaysian preacher to speak
in Malay to a congregation of East Malaysian brethren, “Kamu panggil
Tuhan Allah, tapi kami panggil Tuhan kami, Tuhan.” (You call your God
Allah, we call our God, God.”
Most of us did not like to use the name Allah as well initially,
because of the connotations in Islam, but to remain in solidarity with
the rest of the Christian world, which has been using the name Allah for
centuries, including our Arab Christian brothers and sisters, we also
accepted that our Allah is capable of a personal relationship with
people who choose to know Him.
We have meekly explained our stand for the past 20 years. As the
older generation of church leaders passed on, the younger generation of
Christians like me, who have watched how the situation unfolded, have
this one thing to say: Enough is enough!
Umno’s gutter politics has to be put to a stop, as it is destroying
the country. I am not the only one who is saying this. A ‘pakcik’ who
told me that he had hated Mahathir for many more years, said the same
thing about Umno politics. Looking at TV3, he told me in grief: “Look at
what we are teaching our younger generation.”
On another occasion, he said this: “In the past, Malays talk about religion. These days, they talk nothing but money.”
Fitnah has to stop
Fitnah has to stop
It is a lie that is being spread by Muslim extremists that the name
Allah was included in the Alkitab in order to confuse the Muslims. This
‘reasoning’ only came about during the last 20 years. The first time the
word Allah appeared in the Malay the Alkitab was in fact in the book of
Injil Matius, translated by AC Ruyl between 1612 and 1629.
It is also a lie to say that the name Allah was used in the Malay
translation of the Alkitab in order to convert Malays to Islam. We have
always held that conversion is by one’s choice, and although I wish
everyone, including Professor Tajuddin, to believe in Jesus, it is a
personal choice. Anyone reading the Bible in English or any other
languages can come to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ even without
the so-called confusion over the name, Allah.
Even if the Alkitab is banned, digital copies of the Alkitab in Malay
and Indonesian can be accessed via Youversion.com. The Catholic Herald,
which I hardly can gain access for myself, I wonder if any Muslim has
even laid hands on it to justify such an uproar!
To me, the Allah controversy is nothing but a polemic issue and at
best, a political gimmick to win Malay votes at the expense of the other
communities. Again, from what I can see in retrospect, the issue has
been exploited by Dr Mahathir in the past. Is this the One Malaysia
Najib Abdul Razak had been harping on when he first became the prime
minister?
As far as we are concerned, religion is not, and should not, be made a
State matter. Since Reformation, the church has always separated itself
from the State in what is described by theologians as separation of the
Church and State. Therefore, for Muslim extremists and Umno
propagandists, when attacking the DAP, said that Christians had plotted
to turn Malaysia into a ‘Christian nation’ is an absolute lie. It is
nothing but ‘fitnah’.
For those who read Isma’s fitnah that Anwar Ibrahim is the cause of
the rise of the Christian voice, I leave this to your good judgement. I
rest my case. Any good Muslim man and woman should know the punishment
meted against fitnah, and fear Allah, or face the punishment in one form
or another, but despite all the fitnah, one question that I would like
to leave with Professor Tajuddin is this: “Has the Christian community
revolted with violence?”
Called to give an answer
Called to give an answer
The Christians are called to ‘give an answer’ for their faith, which
includes the reason why the name Allah is being preserved in the
Alkitab. Reading from its context in 1 Peter 3: 13-17, you will
understand why Christians are meekly defiant: ‘Who is going to harm you if you are eager to do good? But even if
you should suffer for what is right, you are blessed. “Do not fear their
threats; do not be frightened.” But in your hearts revere Christ as
Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to
give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness
and respect, keeping a clear conscience, so that those who speak
maliciously against your good behaviour in Christ may be ashamed of
their slander. For it is better, if it is God’s will, to suffer for
doing good than for doing evil.’
I do not need to go into the explanations why the name Allah is
theologically correct to be used in the Alkitab. There are already a lot
of articles written by theologians, but I like to add my point here:
The word Allah is a combination of two words, “Al” (where the word
‘Almighty’ is derived) and “Lah” (which, I believe in Arabic, means
God).
The origin on the word is from the pagan Arabs, which can be traced
back to the original Hebrew word, Elahe, which means Almighty God.
Therefore, to me, the word is not strictly a word used by the Muslims.
Nowhere in the world can anyone copyright or trademark the name Allah.
In fact, the rationale used by Umno and Muslim extremists all along has
turned the nation into a laughing stock even amongst the Muslim
community worldwide despite Najib promoting the image of Malaysia as a
leading Muslim nation.
Meekly defiant
If Professor Tajuddin wants an answer to his proposition, I would
like to end this by saying that the Christian community to date is
‘meekly defiant.’ This is in line with 1 Peter 3: 13-17.
If the Catholic Herald wants to bring this controversy to the highest
court, it is well within their rights to do so in the context of a
democratic nation. It is because they still have some faith in the
courts that they have brought the matter to court in order to allow
justice to be seen being done.
The two rallies that were being called for by Umno Selangor against
Father Lawrence Andrew are nothing but political ugliness when religion
is mixed with politics. As the Christian citizens in this country, we do
not burn the effigies of Najib or Rosmah, or even the Sultan or the
Agong; therefore, such meekness of the Christian church already speaks
volume.
Perhaps, two other men, besides Martin Luther King would best explain
the meaning of ‘meekly defiant’ – Mahatma Gandhi who, despite being
critical was an avid reader of the Bible, and Nelson Mandela, who was
professedly a Christian. Both were meek, but both were also defiant
against injustice.
Be it a fatwa, a law or a Sultan’s decree, with all due respect to
the Sultan and the authorities, the church will remain meekly defiant.
Any good Muslim will understand the Christian sentiments. That, I
believe, is the calling of the church, and with better communication,
the Christians in both Peninsular, Sabah and Sarawak are more united.
Even Christians from both political divide are of one mind, that when
you touch the raw nerve of Christianity, you will have to face the
consequences, as the proverbial saying goes: ‘Reap what you sow.’
No comments:
Post a Comment